> > with the K10D and 16-50 I just let it all hang out.) Way, way, way, too much information...
Mark Roberts wrote: > David Savage wrote: > >> 2008/5/7 Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>> I always loved its image quality. The main reason I went to the Pentax >>> 16-50 was for the weather sealing, which can be important for the kind >>> of photography I like most. (How some of my cameras and lenses have >>> survived downpours on Grandfather Mountain and elsewhere I'll never know!) >>> >> To me it suggests that the whole weather sealing thing may be a bit of >> a sales gimmick. >> > > I dare you to test that hypothesis on your own gear! > I know I wouldn't submit non-sealed equipment to what I've put my K10D > and 16-50/2.8 through! (With the ist-D and non-sealed lenses I at least > tried to protect my gear in the rain, with the K10D and 16-50 I just let > it all hang out.) > > -- Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil... -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
