Den 8. mai. 2008 kl. 23.11 skrev Godfrey DiGiorgi: > > On May 8, 2008, at 1:54 PM, DagT wrote: > >> Den 8. mai. 2008 kl. 22.43 skrev Cotty: >> >>> On 8/5/08, Toralf Lund, discombobulated, unleashed: >>> >>>> 7) Real Photographers don't use SR ;-) >>> >>> They use IS. >> >> In that case they need it, as they can´t get any lens faster than 2.0 >> with IS, and nothing better than 2.8 if you don´t have a lot of >> money .-) > > One hardly needs IS with lenses of f/2 and faster speed, at least if > they're not 150mm or longer. > One can't lift a 300mm f/2 lens anyway, so it will always be a tripod > mounted lens and won't need IS either.
I disagree, or at least I find SR to be very useful with shorter lenses and wider apertures. My pug portrait last month was taken with FA50mm @ 1:1.4, hand held at 1/30s. I also have sharp pictures taken without a tripod with DA14mm @ 1/4s http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=336893 and DA16-50 @ 16mm and 1/8s http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=353011 For me SR has been the most useful new feature since the image sensors. DagT -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
