Anthony Farr wrote: > The way I read it [...]
My general approach to legalese is to take /nothing/ for granted. :-) > assured that the zoo's advertising agency is not stalking you to get > perpetually model-released and royalty free images to plaster up wherever > they choose, no further consent needed. Oh, I wouldn't expect them to do that, simply because it isn't cost effective. However, that verbiage clearly allows them to use your likeness in their advertising, uncompensated, if you are visible in a photo or video or audible in an audio recording that they make while you're on their property. A very common thing. But the verbiage doesn't restrict it to that, either, without some assumptions and inferences. -- Thanks, DougF (KG4LMZ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
