No. Less satisfactory high ISO performance in some cameras the result of noise generated at the time the data is recorded. Camera processing choices come into play to a significant degree only when shooting jpegs. I've yet to shoot a jpeg with the K20D. Paul On Jun 30, 2008, at 3:51 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
> P. J. Alling wrote: >> Some sensors handle the boost much better than others, > Yes, but wouldn't that be because there is less noise to begin > with? I.e > they have better performance at *all* ISOs? >> and the choices >> in processing made by the manufacturer, (as well as hardware), can >> affect the output in pleasant or unpleasant ways. >> > Indeed. But one of the questions I was asking was really, is the > output > on the poorer performers just a result of bad processing choices that > might be fixed on the outside? > > - Toralf > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
