On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:08 AM, AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I submitted about half of my currently accepted pics before the peer
> voting started in September last year. The rest were submitted between
> September and December. Since I've been out of the loop for 6 months I
> don't know if things have changed now, but last year I saw no
> significant difference in acceptance rate before and after peer voting
> was introduced. But i DO think there was a change in what type of pics
> are accepted. I think I bitched a lot about that... :-)

Yes you did.:-)

I submitted mine right at the beginning and 4 of the 5 were accepted.
Most of those being GFM pictures.
Since then i have submitted some shots that won at the local fair, or
were well recieved here, but declined for the gallery.
Unless i now have something i REALLY like i don't bother, which means
i have not submitted in a while.:-)

Dave
>
> Jostein
>
> 2008/7/9 Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> No, 1-10 is my voting average.  Since having originally 53 in the
>> gallery and starting over, I now have 5 in.  Not every single one has
>> been re-submitted but, most have.  I'd say my acceptance rate is more
>> like 1 in 30 now.  I attribute it to 2 major things.  One is the
>> gallery is filled in - so the judges can be much pickier.  The other
>> is peer voting.
>>
>> If I had to guess, anyone else with a large number from the early
>> days would encounter similar experiences to mine...or maybe everyone
>> is out to get me now <evil grin>.
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Bruce
>>
>>
>> Wednesday, July 9, 2008, 4:23:09 AM, you wrote:
>>
>> DJB> If Bruce gets 1-10 and Godders get 0-30, no wonder none of mine have
>> DJB> been accepted, since voting became the norm.
>>
>> DJB> Dave
>>
>> DJB> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Bruce Dayton
>> DJB> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> my average is about the same 1 in 10 gets a thumbs up.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Bruce
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tuesday, July 8, 2008, 10:15:28 AM, you wrote:
>>>>
>>>> MR> They should start charging us (the Gallery participants) a dollar per
>>>> MR> photo for uploads! Maybe five dollars...
>>>>
>>>> MR> No, I'm not serious (though I'd gladly pay it for the 1 or 2 photos per
>>>> MR> month that I submit) but it would sure cut down on people uploading 10
>>>> MR> nearly-identical vacation snapshots. Or flowers. Or shots of their 
>>>> kids.
>>>>
>>>> MR> I do find voting on submitted photos very educational and it definitely
>>>> MR> helps my "eye", but the ratio of "thumbs up" to "thumbs down" is taking
>>>> MR> a big turn for the worse. I used to average 1 in 5 yes votes. Now I
>>>> MR> think it's below 1 in 10.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>>> follow the directions.
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> DJB> --
>> DJB> Equine Photography
>> DJB> www.caughtinmotion.com
>> DJB> http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
>> DJB> Ontario Canada
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
> http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>



-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to