Kevin Waterson wrote: > This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I would think so. But I bet that quite a few wealthy hobbyists buy them as >> well. > > </de-lurk> > > I have been to several Hasselblad function where we get to test drive new > blads. My experience here in Sydney is that the most common users are > wedding photographers.
If you're a wedding photographer who charges $5000-$10,000 (or more) per gig and whose clients are millionaires, you probably *need* a $40,000 camera. Not for the image quality, necessarily, but as part of *your* image, with which you have to market yourself to that kind of customer. Not a big deal for those guys - the camera will pay for itself fairly quickly and its depreciation written of as a business expense. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
