Hi ... thanks for the update on the zooms - or are they variable focus lenses? I can never remember which.
I'd be interested in other comments on comparing the K24/3.5 v K24/2.8 Chris Brogden wrote: > I used it a fair bit, but not a lot. I like the 4x6's I've seen from it, > but I haven't had anything enlarged from it yet. It fared much better > than the A24-50/4 in a casual test I did, but I determined later that the > 24-50 focuses past infinity, possibly because of a misaligned element, so > that could make a difference. In any case, I've decided to sell the > 24-50. It's a hard decision whether to go with the 24-35, or with both a > K24/3.5 (which I have) and a K35/2 (would need to find). > > > What's with the K24/3.5? is it like the 24/2.8 in regard to image > > quality? > > I know nothing about the 24/2.8, unfortunately, so I can't say for > sure. The 24/3.5 is a hellishly sharp lens, though. I like it a lot, but > I can't justify keeping both it and the 24-35. Anyone looking for a > K24/3.5? Or an A24-50/4, for that matter? -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/xmas-story.html - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
