My A 400/5.6 leaves some fringing more often than I'd like. But as a result I've become rather proficient at removing the same. paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Bob W wrote: > >> Har! > >> > >> I'm keeping my R-D1 and three lenses (15/4, 28/1.9, 50/1.5) and of > >> course we have a 'house' *ist Ds which is supposed to be my wife's > >> > > but > > > >> my son uses it a lot. > >> > >> My plan is to just use that for a while, maybe a year or two. > >> Then, I'll > >> get a 36X24 sensor DSLR - either a used Canon 1Ds (mark II or III) > >> ***or*** heaven forbid a full-frame Pentax DSLR (after I've > >> eaten my hat > >> of course). > >> > >> Why? Because I wnat to be able to use my 15/3.5 and A*85/1.4 > >> lenses with > >> the angle of view that they were intended to be.... > >> > >> > > > > do you notice any particular loss of quality using lenses that were > > designed for film on the smaller sensors? I ask because several of my > > Zeiss lenses produce quite noticeable purple fringing, particularly in > > backlight, when used on the Olympuses. I understand why it happens, > > but I wonder if there are similar issues on other digital systems. > > > > Bob > > > > > > > > Very entertaining story, Cotty. > > Bob, a few wonderful Pentax lenses are surprisingly ordinary on digital. > My FA*24 comes to mind, although I've heard others haven't had a problem > with it. I also get the occasional oddity with the K and A 50/1.2, but > it isn't noticeable if used in low light. > > Derby > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
