frank theriault wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:18 PM, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> If they were wearing helmets shouldn't they have been saved?  Horrors
>> another illusion shattered...
>>     
>
> I know it's counter-intuitive, but helmets actually increase
> risk-taking behaviour.  Since they were wearing helmets they thought
> they were invincible, and so considered copulating on a railroad track
> before an oncoming train to be a risk worth taking.
>
> Had they not been wearing helmets, they'd have likely been doing it in
> a field or something.
>
> Of course, the booze may have been a factor as well...
>
> cheers,
> frank, suddenly switching sides in the Great Helmet Debate
>   
That's all right.  I'm going to on both sides of the helmet debate...


-- 
You get further with a kind word and a gun, than with a kind word alone.
        --Al Capone.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to