This theory could only be considered if everyone held the camera the same way (shutter release on top, or bottom). That's about 50/50 from what I've seen.
Thanks, Ed http://lightandsilver.com > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Frantisek Vlcek > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 5:51 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: MZ-S AF pattern - strange verticals? > > > Hi, > Just out of curiosity, why do you think (if you find it lacking) > MZ-S lacks a bottom (far-right when vertical) AF point? For me, it > would make AFing portraits pretty difficult, as we (the part of > PDML using Latin alphabet or writing in left>right direction) tend > to read photos from left to right, so an "optimized" portrait > placing is looking to the left, on right side of frame (if I can > exaggerate it somehow). > > I am just curious if this missing AF point is beacuse of Japanese > "reverse" right>left reading direction. Our reading direction has a > definite impact on reading photographs, and their has probably too. <snip> - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
