I didn't say that. What they measure must be true and the 16-50 was the third sample. Maybe I'm very lucky in sample variations. I didn't try my luck on the 16-50...
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Toine wrote: >> >> After reading this review I wouldn't dare buying this lens. As a >> reference Photozone trashed the 50-200 completely. For pixelpeeping >> fun I got this lens a few days ago for very little money (thanks >> photozone!). The 50-200 is simply amazing (if you stop it down one or >> two steps). >> They also think my other lenses are middle of the road or worse. ROFL! > > So I take it that Photozone has replaced Photodo as the bullshit lens test > wank-fest site of choice these days? > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
