Correction to my previous message: found 16-50/2.8 locally. Here it
costs $1,000.
Boris
William Robb wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Boris Liberman"
Subject: Opinions about DA 17-70/4 SDM wanted
Hi!
I don't recall any significant discussion of this lens. Anyone owning
it? Or is it the general opinion of this list, that this lens is of
insufficient quality? How about distortion at 17 mm?
Does the word Hoover mean anything to you?
Seriously, it's sharp and contrasty enough, but the barrel distortion is
awful.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
