It is *very* sharp and contrasty. I love mine. As a walkaround lens,
it's almost perfect (far superior to 16-50, which is quite heavy and
has 77mm filter)

mishka

On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 3:20 PM, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Boris Liberman"
> Subject: Opinions about DA 17-70/4 SDM wanted
>
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I don't recall any significant discussion of this lens. Anyone owning it?
>> Or is it the general opinion of this list, that this lens is of insufficient
>> quality? How about distortion at 17 mm?
>
> Does the word Hoover mean anything to you?
> Seriously, it's sharp and contrasty enough, but the barrel distortion is
> awful.
>
> William Robb
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to