Thanks John :) I was getting paranoid at the silence... I too am an amateur and am working on a tight budget so cant afford the likes of the limited lenses, so I really tend to look at the "bargain" end of the spectrum. Perhaps I should break out my old screw mount equipment LOL
Regards, /\/\ick... -----Original Message----- From: Karasch,John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:27 AM To: 'Mick Maguire ' Subject: RE: Pentax SMC-F 135 f2.8 I've had a 135 2.8 for more than 10 years, used mostly for portraits. It may not be the perfect lense for that purpose, but it hasn't disappointed this amateur photographer. However, I don't have an 85mm or 77 Limited to compare it against. A new 135 is at least $320, so $165 might be okay for a lense in good condition. John -----Original Message----- From: Mick Maguire To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12/13/01 9:46 PM Subject: RE: Pentax SMC-F 135 f2.8 Mick Maguire wrote: > Is this lens any good? what's it best suited for > (portraiture etc)? Is it a reasonable buy at $165? > any thoughts / opinions anybody? Is it true that *nobody* on this list has an opinion on this lens?? Or are you all just ignoring me? Regards, /\/\ick... - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
