This is true. 2009/4/7 JC OConnell <hifis...@gate.net>: > Its important to remember, that while good technique > cant improve a "bad" image, bad technique CAN > destroy a "good" image. Technique isnt everything, but > it doesnt hurt to get it right. > > JC O'Connell > hifis...@gate.net > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of > David Savage > Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 9:28 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Trading resolution for depth of field > > > 2009/4/7 frank theriault <knarftheria...@gmail.com>: >> But you can bang my head with all the numbers and theories you want, >> until I go do it over and over, I'm not going to "get it". Some >> people like the theory behind things, and that's fine, too. But we >> can't forget what the underlying theory is about: going out and >> taking photos! > > Amen! > > All also add that there thousands upon thousand of technically > competent, but mind numbingly boring, photos on the inter web. > > I know, I have added quite a few to the technically competent, but > mediocre, pool myself. > > DS
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
