...glad to read the two of you agreeing. Now David, may I use that photo
of yours as desktop background for a while? I tried to laugh quietly but
my co-workers perceived the tears in my eyes and I had to show them the
thread.
They also would like to use the photo as background for a while...
LF
David Savage escreveu:
This is true.
2009/4/7 JC OConnell <hifis...@gate.net>:
Its important to remember, that while good technique
cant improve a "bad" image, bad technique CAN
destroy a "good" image. Technique isnt everything, but
it doesnt hurt to get it right.
JC O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-----Original Message-----
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
David Savage
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 9:28 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Trading resolution for depth of field
2009/4/7 frank theriault <knarftheria...@gmail.com>:
But you can bang my head with all the numbers and theories you want,
until I go do it over and over, I'm not going to "get it". Some
people like the theory behind things, and that's fine, too. But we
can't forget what the underlying theory is about: going out and
taking photos!
Amen!
All also add that there thousands upon thousand of technically
competent, but mind numbingly boring, photos on the inter web.
I know, I have added quite a few to the technically competent, but
mediocre, pool myself.
DS
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
Luiz Felipe
luiz.felipe at techmit.com.br
http://techmit.com.br/luizfelipe/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
