Thanks, too early for the DA 15/4 then, did they test the FA 28/2.8 by any chance? it never seems to get any recognition despite being a fine lens IMHO. It would be asking a lot to ask you to scan the article, but the offer is much appreciated. Maybe I can pick up a copy on Evilbay.
Best regards, John ________________________________________ From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Thibouille [pentaxl...@gmail.com] Sent: 13 April 2009 15:16 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Difference between 16-45 and 17-70 Number 304, june 2008. But I have a scanner ;) -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille ---------------------- Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
