----- Mensaje original ----
> De: John Coyle <jco...@powerup.com.au>
> Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
> Enviado: martes, 21 de abril, 2009 10:31:45
> Asunto: RE: Yet another disaster!
>
> Thanks to Jaume and John Francis for correcting my (distressed) typing! I
> had thought the * indicated a power zoom facility, which is the one I have -
> although I don't think I've ever used it that way.
>
> Is the later version as good (the one with max. aperture of 3.2), does
> anyone have experience?
>
I had it in my latter film years and I loved it a lot. I did some
comparison test with the budget but respected 28-70/4 and the 28-105
was a clear winner. They were about the same size and weight, another plus for
my taste (the powerzoom that you own is bigger).
When moving to digital I found its range not too convenient so I ended up
selling it.
Regards,
Jaume
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
