Hi,
I don't know what EXIF-viewer do you use, but here is the screenshot
from Pentax Photo Browser:
http://nagi.ee/photos/photo_sizes.php?id=10410167&size=o&album_id=148643
BR, Margus
Graydon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 03:13:39PM -0600, William Robb scripsit:
From: "Margus M?nnik"
Random tourist (Tallinn Old City is full of 'em) shot at f/5.6. I
was going to shoot a church tower in background and she simply
walked into the frame...
http://nagi.ee/photos/photo_sizes.php?id=10408771&size=o&album_id=148643
(full size, untouched jpeg from camera)
So, boys and girls, we're doomed. There's nothing to whine about
Pentax (long zoom) lenses quality any more - all those hundreds and
thousands of crappy pictures will be our own fault.
Damn. This kind of things might make me change my plans....
It's a gorgeous picture, but I do wonder about a couple bits of the
EXIF, particularly
SR Result : Stabilized
Shake Reduction : Unknown (15)
SR Half Press Time : 4.25 s or longer
SR Focal Length : 196 mm
That would seem to indicate that SR was on, that the lens is unknown to
the firmware, and that the actual focal length is less than 200mm
despite the lens being set at 250mm. (Which I understand is a plausible
result of distance-to-subject in some designs.)
I would be curious as to anyone else's interpretation of that EXIF
information.
-- Graydon
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
