On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 08:33:19AM -0500, Bob Sullivan scripsit: > Graydon, > I've never seen shake reduction focal length before.
There's a *lot* of stuff in the EXIF that doesn't seem to get looked at, normally. There's something north of a thousand things that *can* go in there, though the K20D only seems to use 200 or so. (203 in my DNG exifs, anyway.) > The variation with the DA 35mm macro makes me wonder. > Is it trying to figure actual length of the lens from focal distance used? That would be my guess. > Macros can change a lot depending on focal distance. > This would change the actual length of the lens for shake. Yup. Which brings up "how can it tell?" -- Graydon -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
