---- Luiz Felipe <luiz.fel...@techmit.com.br> wrote: > I was looking for data on the available 180~200mm 2.8 lenses for K and > EF mounts, and found some story about how the DA* 200 2.8 is related to > the former 200mm full frame and so it possibly would cover said full frame. > > That got me wondering if one of the tech-oriented actually knows the > image circle dimensions for the DA lenses, and how much is missing. I > know the difference should be proportional to the difference from APS-C > to 24x36mm, but would like ko know the size and borderline falloff > evolution on the DA lenses. > > Just wondering, TIA. :-)
>From personal testing with the 18-55 on an LX, full-frame coverage seems to be >acheived somewhere between 24 and 28mm. The 50-200 displays full frame >coverage throughout. Whether that coverage is useable with any particular >lens is an entirely different matter. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
