Dave, I shot a handful of jpegs in the kitchen (incandscent light at sunset). They were quite snappy and colorful, even a bit blue near the window light. At jpeg quality 3, the jpegs were 6-7meg. At highest quality (4) they were 8-9 meg.
In the morning I got better light and shot RAW+ (DGN's +JPG's) at the arboretum. I'm not sure why you would do that. The DGN's were 16-19 megs and the jpegs 9-10 megs. The outdoor jpegs looked fine, but I've not done pixel peeping, just loaded them in Photoshop Elements 5.0. Regards, Bob S. On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 4:39 AM, David J Brooks<pentko...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 4:53 AM, paul stenquist<pnstenqu...@comcast.net> > wrote: >> > >> >> Yes, that's how mine arrived. Haven't shot any jpegs yet and probably won't. > > But Kenny boy says we should.:-) > > >> >>> Is this Pentax's reaction to being accused of 'soft' images? > > Interested in your take on your jpegs Bob, i usually shot in jpeg mode. > Ken R said to. :-) > > Dave > > > -- > Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. > www.caughtinmotion.com > http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ > York Region, Ontario, Canada > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
