well, there are exceptions to every rule I guess, but in general the further you get away from 50mm ( 33mm on digital ), the less often you are going to need it. That's why they call normal normal.
-- J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net) Home Page - www.jchriso.com Join the Audio CD PLAYER DISCUSSION list - http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/ -----Original Message----- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Graydon Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 4:54 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: My current prime lens A-Team On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 03:33:07PM -0400, J.C. O'Connell scripsit: > On Pentax digital, you are most likely going to get a lot more use out > of a 135,200, or 300, than the 400. 400mm is just very very long on > digital and will rarely be needed. Unless you do birds, in which case 400mm is awfully short. -- Graydon -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
