On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:12:08PM +0100, mike wilson scripsit: > > ---- Graydon <o...@uniserve.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 03:33:07PM -0400, J.C. O'Connell scripsit: > > > On Pentax digital, you are most likely going to get a lot more use out > > > of a 135,200, or 300, than the 400. 400mm is just very very long on > > > digital and will rarely be needed. > > > > Unless you do birds, in which case 400mm is awfully short. > > You must know some awfully big birds.
400mm = 40 cm ~= 16 in; less than half crow wingspan. No need to invoke swans and ostriches. -- Graydon -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
