not necessariliy, overcompensation doesn't necessisarily mean a larger error than no compensation. It would take some math to figure out how far off the focal length setting would have to be for the antishake to be doing more harm when compared to no antishake at all. I don't feel like doing it.
-- J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net) Home Page - www.jchriso.com Join the Audio CD PLAYER DISCUSSION list - http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/ -----Original Message----- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 1:45 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Best compromise for focal length using K and A zooms. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Robinson" Subject: Re: Best compromise for focal length using K and A zooms. > > I will say that setting it to less than the full zoom length risks > under-correcting right at the time you'd need it most, so I don't get > that strategy. Anyone? Setting it to the longest or near longest FL means you are overcorrecting any time the lens is used below the input focal length. This is an area where too little is better than too much. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
