Thanks, Bob. It is one of my favorite travel images, which is why I was bummed out when Pentax rejected it after holding it under review for so long.
Dan On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Bob Sullivan<rf.sulli...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dan, > Trite or not, it's still a magnificent image. > Regards, Bob S. > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Daniel J. Matyola<danmaty...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks for your kind remarks, Jack and Paul. >> >> Although this is one of my favorite images, I think it may have been >> viewed as trite. When I took the image, I had never seen photos of >> Peyto Lake, and I was stunned by its beauty. Since then, I have seen >> a number of shots taken from this precise vantage point, and they all >> look pretty much the same. I think that the image may have gotten >> enough votes, but that the Pentax reviewers might have said "Ho-hum, >> not this again." >> >> Thanks for looking. >> >> Dan >> >> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Jack Davis<jdavi...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> Magnificent shot. Was possibly held for further review which could very >>> well be a compliment to the image. Unfortunately they don't provide a grade. >>> >>> Jack >>> >>> --- On Mon, 8/31/09, Daniel J. Matyola <danmaty...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> From: Daniel J. Matyola <danmaty...@gmail.com> >>>> Subject: Re: PPG quota >>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> >>>> Date: Monday, August 31, 2009, 6:39 PM >>>> I had another of those frustrating >>>> experiences with the PPG. >>>> >>>> Almost a month ago, I submitted several old scanned images, >>>> including this one: >>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9522634 >>>> >>>> All the others were rejected. in about 2 weeks. >>>> I submitted several >>>> more, and they were rejected, but this one remained "ready >>>> for >>>> review." Today, finally, it showed up in the >>>> "Declined" section. >>>> Somehow, it doesn't bother me when images are rejected >>>> promptly, but >>>> when one is held for almost a month, I get my hopes up, and >>>> get >>>> disappointed when it is finally rejected after an extended >>>> "review." >>>> >>>> Dan >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link >>>> directly above and follow the directions. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >>> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
