Well, everything worked except the depth of field... Regards, Bob S. On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Daniel J. Matyola<danmaty...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hell, no. I love blunt. Especially when it's correct. <G> > > You will note that this is the one I submitted last, because it is the > one I liked least. Another shot I took at this angle had even less > DoF, and the highlights were even more blown out. > > I had to lie down in an uncomfortable position to get this angle, not > that it is an excuse. I wanted to try it, but it didn't work. > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Jack Davis<jdavi...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> DoF far too shallow and background way busy. Hope not too blunt. =) >> >> Jack >> >> Jack >> >> --- On Tue, 9/1/09, Daniel J. Matyola <danmaty...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> From: Daniel J. Matyola <danmaty...@gmail.com> >>> Subject: PESO: Umbrella >>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> >>> Date: Tuesday, September 1, 2009, 12:50 PM >>> The last in my series of 'shrooms: >>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9715959&size=md >>> >>> Dan > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. >
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
