Ken Waller wrote:

>From: "William Robb" <war...@gmail.com>
>> From: "eckinator"
>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I quickly came to the realization that if I get it right in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the camera, I can save myself boatloads of post processing time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why is everyone so damned busy processing posts?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm on the fence about that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't worry, I'll picket up from here.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Don't you guys ever get board with the pun threads?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why wood we?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They're just knot very funny.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So the anti-punsters will just have to grain and bear it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think they should be pulped!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> now you're being fictitious!
>>>>>
>>>>> no, just quentintious...
>>>>
>>>> there there, here's a quentin solace...
>>>>
>>> I guess I have my master in quentin physics for a reason ]=)
>> 
>> Thats travolting 
>> 
>But isn't that going against the grain ?

Now you're making me cross - cut it out!


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to