That's a really appealing image.  The composition is excellent with the
mountain peak placed well to give the image overall balance.

I think the dark foreground provides a nice contrast with the mountain
image.  The light clouds are a bonus!



Cheers

Brian

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/



On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 02:42 -0400, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
> I just got back from a little 3 1/2 - 4 day trip  to Yosemite.
> 
> I went 3 years ago in October and discovered then it was  much easier to 
> get in the fall. So I thought I'd try it again. Only this time it  was
> MUCH 
> colder and I found it hard to walk around and take shots, I got so 
> chilled. 
> 
> The second day it warmed up a little and there were clouds!  (The first
> day 
> and three years ago there were none, which is-not-good.)  
> 
> Yosemite is dynamic range problem, the rocks reflect back a lot of light  
> and the pine trees are very dark. Three years ago I blew out tons of
> shots. 
> This  time around I used exposure lock as much as possible. Made a big  
> difference.
> 
> The title of this is more how I feel about it than anything  -- that
> there 
> were clouds and that exposure lock was helping me solving the  bright
> rock 
> problem.
> 
> This Half Dome taken in a field near Camp Curry. Not  a preferred place
> to 
> take it. Probably because nothing shows scale. The only  thing that shows 
> scale is that those little green things on top are pine  trees.
> 
> http://www.mapphotography.com/PAWS/pages/halfdomepow.htm
> 
> Comments  welcome.
> 
> Marnie aka Doe  :-)
> 
> 
-- 


-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different...


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to