Mmm I'm not sure I'm good. There may be worse photographers however :) I'll post some shots :)
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Boris Liberman <bori...@gmail.com> wrote: > Congratulations. Then, it is likely you would be able to resist temptation > of either DA 70/2.4 or FA 77/1.8. Though having the latter it was easy to > resist temptation of your newly bought lens. > > Have fun and be sure to show some pictures. I know for the fact, that you > are a good photographer. > > Boris > > > > Thibouille wrote: >> >> I did not plan to buy that one although I know it is a wonderful lens, >> price was way to high for me. >> I found one on the bay which stayed at 550 Euros, pristine shape and >> still under warranty. >> My usual dealer has it for 1100 Euors.. ouch ! >> >> Couldn't resist.. was too hard... >> I'm still very early in the testing though. The only thing which could >> have been improved IMO is the minimal focussing distance which is OK >> but not great either. >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs ---------------------- Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45, DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ ... Laptop: Macbook 13" Unibody SnowLeo/Win7 Programing: Delphi 2009 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
