On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 4:11 PM, P. J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> wrote: > My opinion, for what it's worth, is that none of the tests really mean much, > and they seem to be more subjective than all the charts and graphs would > indicate.. The best way to see if the low light performance is to shoot > some photos and decide it you like hot they look.
That's true, but the consensus is that none of the K-10/20/7 represent a major leap forward in terms of low-light mojo. I went from *ist-D to K20 and that was significant, but I bet the anti-shake was part of the deal. Haven't tried a K-X, but it may be the case that it's a pleasant surprise. BTW, I did some test shooting the other night at a not-very-well-lit party with a Canon S90 and was flabbergasted. Mind you, I was judging the pix by their presentation on the dinky LCD on the back, but jeepers, it seemed remarkable for a pocket camera. -T -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
