2010/1/10 Tanya Love <tanyal...@bigpond.com>: > How many of you have K20s/K7s and do you think the cost is worth the > improvements of the latter over the former?
That depends on your usage. I much treasure the functions beefed up; AF speed, multisegment light metering and fps. But then again I'm probably now the tailgunner mr. Robb mentioned prophetically last year. If you don't need those functions, the only lure of K-7 is some improvements in image quality. The noise floor may be ever so slightly lower, I doubt the measurbators are able to quantify it properly. It might as well be caused by the improved light metering. The K-7 tends to put the to of the histogram hump further to the right than do K20D. There's still a lot of leeway for picking down the highlights, though, so the net effect is that the noise floor seems to be lower. Jostein -- http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ http://alunfoto.blogspot.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
