On Feb 15, 2010, at 12:52 PM, Adam Maas wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Dario Bonazza > <dario.bona...@virgilio.it> wrote: >> Bruce Dayton wrote: >> >> >>> Hello Larry, >>> >>> Seems you had two main questions: >>> >>> 1) how many stops better is the K-x than the K20D. >>> Based on my limited testing, I'd say I don't really want to use the >>> K20D past 1600 if I can help it. The K-x I'd say 6400 is about where >>> I'd rather not go past. So the K-x seems to be at least 2 stops >>> better than the K20D. >> >> Yes, at least. Probably a bit more. >> >>> So, could I live with just the K-x? Yes, I think I could. Of >>> course, the K-x sensor in a K-7 would be the ultimate. >> >> Woohooo! Another good guy on the boat! Time to start a Facebook thingie? >> >> Dario >> > > I wouldn't expect the K-X sensor in an updated K-7. However there is a > 14MP version of the sensor with similar high ISO performance and > capable of 7fps, THAT's what I'd like to see in an updated K-7
I'd be quite happy with that. Paul > (it's > currently used in Sony's A450 and A550, the K-X shares a sensor with > the A500). > > > -- > M. Adam Maas > http://www.mawz.ca > Explorations of the City Around Us. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
