On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Tom C <caka...@gmail.com> wrote: > Expressing that I'm not trying argue with you for the sake of it... :-)
MARK!! LOL > The 4/3 format has some intriguing aspects, but for me, given a > limited monetary resource, I'd prefer to go with basic higher > resolution/pixel count. The size factor of some of the new 4/3 > offerings is cool as well as the ability to use Leica lenses. Plus > some of the bodies are just cool looking. Resolution/pixel count, imo, once past 5-6 Mpixel, are of greatly diminished real value for the range of photography I do. But to continue in this train of thought is to once again delve into the subject of my favorite saying: "Equipment often gets in the way of Photography." I'd rather do Photography and leave the bits and bytes argumentation to the camera enthusiasts. I know the equipment I have is working well and capable for the uses I put it to ... That's what's important to me. I'll stick to making photographs and bow out of this discussion. :-) -- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
