On 4/5/2010 4:05 PM, Margus Männik wrote:
John Sessoms wrote:
From: Margus M?nnik
Somewhy many people think "wow, it looks so good, so it has to be
also very smart". No, I-10 is technically quite an average compact.
But it still looks cool :) For me, Optio I-10 is one of the very
few things (and the only camera) in my life that I have bought
purely because how it looks.
BR, Margus
P. J. Alling wrote:
> No, I didn't write it. Unfortunately it confirms pretty much
what I > expected.
>
>
http://www.neutralday.com/pentax-optio-i-10-digital-compact-camera-in-depth-review/
>
>
I think a lot of people see the "retro" styling and expect it to be a
digital Auto-110. They're disappointed when they find out it's not.
For being "digital Auto110" I-10 should have 1) interchangeable
lenses, 2) decent optical viewfinder and 3) larger sensor. Right now
it is just a compact camera with cool body and should be treated like
one.
Well, apparently, it fully matches the specifications for a camera
costing fully 1/3rd it's price.
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
interface subtly weird.\par
}
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
