Good..let's go with that. ;) Jack
--- On Mon, 4/5/10, Joseph McAllister <pentax...@mac.com> wrote: > From: Joseph McAllister <pentax...@mac.com> > Subject: Re: Define "blown out" :-) > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> > Date: Monday, April 5, 2010, 2:42 PM > If you watched this mornings shuttle > launch, you would have seen that the shuttle, it's external > tank, and the boosters were well defined. The result of the > combustion of the contents of all but the shuttle were > "blown out". > > Apparently a better outcome than "blown up". > > > On Apr 5, 2010, at 13:28 , Jack Davis wrote: > > > Well the conversation went on for several posts and > finally I invited posters to define what they consider a > "blown out" image. IOW, how featureless must the image be to > meet your criteria of "blown out." > > Thought it might explain why the disparity of opinions > beyond the monitor's contribution. > > Joseph McAllister > pentax...@mac.com > > “ The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets > the cheese.” > — Kevan Olesen > > > --PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
