I'm sure I was diverted by his swaggering manner and some history. If it was of some value to someone, it wasn't a complete waste.
Jack --- On Mon, 4/5/10, Brian Walters <supera1...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > From: Brian Walters <supera1...@fastmail.fm> > Subject: Re: Define "blown out" :-) > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> > Date: Monday, April 5, 2010, 4:38 PM > On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:24 -0700, > "Jack Davis" <jdavi...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > I gave my honest reaction to the crude first half > dozen words of your > > first sentence. I read no further nor do I intend to. > > You're obviously still stinging from the dressing down > you receive some > > time ago. > > > > Geez - I'll have to pay better attention. Must have > missed that one. > > :-)> > > FWIW, I though Godders' original reply was > informative. Maybe not what > you were looking for but I got some good value out of it. > > > > Cheers > > Brian > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Brian Walters > Western Sydney Australia > http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/ > > > > > > > --- On Mon, 4/5/10, Joseph McAllister <pentax...@mac.com> > wrote: > > > > > From: Joseph McAllister <pentax...@mac.com> > > > Subject: Re: Define "blown out" :-) > > > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> > > > Date: Monday, April 5, 2010, 2:38 PM > > > On Apr 5, 2010, at 14:36 , Godfrey > > > DiGiorgi wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Jack Davis > <jdavi...@yahoo.com> > > > wrote: > > > >> Well the conversation went on for > several posts > > > and finally I invited posters to define what they > consider a > > > "blown out" image. IOW, how featureless must the > image be to > > > meet your criteria of "blown out." > > > >> Thought it might explain why the > disparity of > > > opinions beyond the monitor's contribution. > > > > > > > > And I gave you a precise answer ... said yet > another > > > way, "An image is > > > > 'blown out' when the detail you are trying > to retain > > > is no longer > > > > visible." > > > > > > > > It's a testament to your inability to > articulate an > > > intelligible > > > > question if you don't understand what I > said. But of > > > course, you > > > > probably don't want to learn or read > anything that > > > disagrees with your > > > > nebulous notions. > > > > > > > > > Another Lude, Sir Godfrey? > > > > > > > > > -- > > > -- > http://www.fastmail.fm - Access all of your messages > and folders > > wherever you are > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
