I've had the earlier one for a few years now and I'm completely satisfied with the performance, the build quality is great too.
John ________________________________________ From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bong Manayon [bongmana...@gmail.com] Sent: 12 April 2010 22:48 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Ultra-wide zooms [Scanned][Spam score:8%] On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:26 PM, John Sessoms <jsessoms...@nc.rr.com> wrote: > > The Sigma 10-20 comes in two versions f/4-5.6 & a constant aperture f/3.5. > > I have the former and am quite pleased with it, although I'm still learning > when and how to use it to maximum advantage. A lot of people badmouth Sigma > lenses, but the build quality on this lens is rock solid. > > I have the Pentax FAJ 18-35 that I consider a really sloppy lens, and the > Sigma is miles above it in quality. > Thanks! The one I'm trying out now is the 4-5.6 and it impresses me--and I admit I'm biased against Sigma (had bad experience way back with their quality control problem). Bong -- Bong Manayon http://www.bong.uni.cc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
