DSLR's have their place now in filmmaking (yes I know it's not film, but
programme-makers still affectionately refer to the process as
filmmaking, including this one) it is true - but there are limitations.
If you're reading this thread then you will also find this article
interesting:

<http://philipbloom.co.uk/2010/04/19/in-depth-interview-with-executive-
producer-and-director-of-house-season-finale-shot-on-canon-5dmkii/>

<http://tinyurl.com/housefinalbloom>

I have no desire to rush out yet and buy a DSLR in the process of
filming for TV. I have 2 cameras - a big shoulder-mount Sony DVCam and a
small HD handheld. The problem with handheld filming is mass - the small
cameras don't have the weight in them to steady things down. Not talking
about image stabilisation or anything, just 'steadiness' of handheld
shots, even zoomed out at wide angles. A weighty shoulder mount camera
provides an extremely stable platform for handheld shooting. A small
camera does not, and the movements can be jerky and nauseating as a result.

Even on a tripod, a small camera does not cut it. A big camera weighing
20+ lbs will pan beautifully with a nice fluid head, and ride up and
stop on a dime. A small camera will not. Next time you see a nature film
with a panning landscape shot, watch how the operator slows the camera
at the end of the pan until it just gently comes to a stop - rather than
an abrupt jerky bump. A bit like stopping a car - you let up on the
brake just before you stop other wise everyone jerks forward. That's
skill, yes - but even a seasoned operator can have trouble getting that
smoothness with a small camera even on a fluid head tripod. It's very
difficult, even for me (!) but all these youngsters running around now
with small cameras and DSLRs - they're all trying to do it and boy it
makes me cringe when I see most efforts.

Don't get me wrong - DSLRs and small handhelds have their place. I love
shooting fly-on-the-wall with my small camera - it's unobtrusive and
lightweight, I've got 2 mic inputs so can place a radio mic on a subject
and get ambient with the on-board mic. Great fun and I love it. But if
you're out getting nature, sport, documentary footage and so on, a big
camera is a must.

That said, DSLRs are there and there is now a growing aftermarket for
balanced sound input/outputs, viewfinder add-ons, matte-boxes and so on.
Very exciting to see where it goes. If it means more people get
interested in video and start making programmes, I'm all for it. The one
thing to watch though is that making a programme, fact or fiction, is
all about telling a story.  Great cameras make great shots, but great
storytellers make great films.

.02

--


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)  |     People, Places, Pastiche
----------      http://www.cottysnaps.com
_____________________________



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to