If they're going to 21mp I'd hope they'd go for a larger sensor.
On 4/28/2010 1:26 PM, Tom C wrote:
I'd hope for 21MP, but certainly they could not/would not go backwards
in raw sensor resolution.
Tom C.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:18 PM, William Robb<war...@gmail.com> wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "CheekyGeek"
Subject: Re: K-7 replacement?
I would simply add that having your $500 camera out-perform your
flagship $1000 camera is a bit of embarrassment that must be rectified
with at minimum an upgrade version of the K7, if not an entirely new
model. In other words, if you take what you learned in creating the
K-x and put it in your flagship model, you've got a World-Beater.
To be fair, the K-x outperforms the K7 in only one parameter.
Dropping the K-x sensor into a K7 body and calling it a new camera isn't
viable since it would be going backwards in megapixels.
I like Adam's idea of a 14mp Sony sensor, but I'd really like to see
something closer to 18mp.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
interface subtly weird.\par
}
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
