Adam Maas wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:59 AM, Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> wrote:
Where do you rate the 55/1.4?
Sharp, soft, exotic or not close enough to 50 to count?
From what I've seen, the 55/1.4's on the border of the exotic range
price-wise. What I've seen from it looks good, and it's better than
the FA 50 at wide apertures, but I don't think it comes close to
justifying its price over the other options in K mount (all three of
the excellent 3rd party fast ~50-ish lenses are notably cheaper than
the 55/1.4, with similar performance. Pentax is not in a position to
demand a price premium over Zeiss)
But /they/ don't have SDM or the incredibly sexy felt-lined lens hood. :-)
The 55/1.4 has become my default carry lens. I shoot portraits, indoor
music gigs, outdoor flowers, in the rain, you name it. LBA never got me
a better buzz.
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
