On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Joseph McAllister <pentax...@mac.com> wrote:
> On Apr 30, 2010, at 07:37 , Adam Maas wrote:

>>
>> The Sigma's got HSM (proper ring-type USM, faster than SDM), the rest
>> are MF, but oh so nicely damped focus throws. Frankly I think the DA*
>> 55's a damned good lens, but it should be $6-700CDN, not $900CDN.
>
>
>
> I'm sorry, but a 55mm ƒ1.4 lens should not cost more than $300, period. And
> I feel that's pushing it. The design is a gazillion years old. SDM can't
> cost more than $10 to design into a production lens barrel, and flocking in
> a lens hood goes back to the earliest days of still and motion picture
> photography. Big woop.

The design is brand new (It's not an update of the older 50/1.4 or
55/1.8) and it gets a high-end barrel (High build quality, weather
sealed, SDM).



-- 
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to