Tjena tillbaka Jostein, thanks for help. I also see that your experience with LX seems to be better than Alan Chan's or William Robbs'. Their postings actually make me think and wonder. Maybe It would be better to leave the Pentax line and change to Nikon while there is time. On the other hand I'm quite satisfied with my Z1-p and MZ-3. Hejdå, Peter
>Btw, my LX is old. it's batch number says it's made in October 1980. I >have had it for two and a half years, and it hasn't let me down once. >Not even in 25 deg. minus, last winter at Røros. >If the price is right, I wouldn't hesitate to buy whatever vintage it >is. Those cameras are built to endure. > >Best, >Jostein > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Peter Smekal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 7:27 PM >Subject: Help: LX-numbers again > > >> I might buy an LX. The seller tells me that he bought it in 1995. >According >> to Pentax/Sweden LX's built in the nineties have batchnumbers (in >the film >> cassette compartment). The sellers says he can't find any >batchnumber. >> The serial number is 532xxxx. According to the list on >> http://members.iinet.net.au/~cam/serial/ >> LX's from the nineties should have serial numbers that start with >534 or 535. >> Maybe some LX-owners can help me in this comfusion? >> Thanks >> >> Peter Smekal >> Uppsala, Sweden >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> - >> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, >> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to >> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . >- >This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, >go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to >visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . Peter Smekal Uppsala, Sweden [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
