It better contain it's own power supply as well if you're going to mount
it on a K1000.
The other problem I see is that if the camera has no information on what
the lens is doing then in camera SR will have to be switched off or the
two systems will tend to over compensate, possibly by quite a lot.
On 5/20/2010 8:33 PM, Anthony Farr wrote:
If the lens contains its own shake sensor there's no need for the
camera to have SR at all. Theoretically, it'd work on a K1000 if you
didn't mind manual focusing.
regards, Anthony
"Of what use is lens and light
to those who lack in mind and sight"
(Anon)
On 21 May 2010 07:34, P. J. Alling<webstertwenty...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Pentax, yes. Especially since Pentax doesn't support Optical
Stabilization.
On 5/20/2010 5:08 PM, eckinator wrote:
Is use of them mutually exclusive?
Cheers
Ecke
2010/5/20 John Whittingham<jo...@carmel.ac.uk>:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/1005/10051401sigma120mm400sonypentax.asp#press
Could be of interest to all those finding SR useless on long lenses, the
150-500 APO HSM is already listed at Sigma UK.
John
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0
Courier New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
interface subtly weird.\par
}
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
interface subtly weird.\par
}
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
