William Robb wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "John Sessoms"
Subject: Re: Leica M9
In the case that started this discussion, the return was made in
accordance with the retailer's published return policy.
Not quite.
Their return policy definitely states that items that have been damaged
through customer use or abuse do not qualify for return.
“...[U]se or abuse do not qualify...” Totally clear English.
The question seems to be does spilling a drink on a non waterproof
camera consitute customer abuse.
I’d say yes it did. Abnormal use = abuse. I seriously doubt that camera
designers factor in an alcoholic drink being spilled onto their non-waterproof
body, and would certify normal performance thereafter.
Answer that and you have answered if the return policy was followed.
William Robb
keith
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
