Sorry - I think 1 is way better.... straight on closeups of blossoms
with shar foreground fading to out of focus edges is something
one sees an awful lot of ... the 1st one has much more going on ,
beautifully balanced, etc...
anway - its just IMHO :_)
ann
Toine wrote:
That's interesting... With the first one you point at 1/4? I was
hoping you would choose nr 2/4 :)
Toine
On 21 June 2010 16:47, Ann Sanfedele <ann...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
This one is especially nice .... stunning , in fact ...
http://www.repiuk.nl/index.php/blog-mainmenu-97/141-orchids
The others are much less interseting, I think and frankly having them in the
group kinda diminishes the strength of the
first one...
If I were viewing only the first one I'd think "wow, what a fine flor
photographer !" in combination with the others
(especially the last two) I'd think how lucky you got with the first one as
the last two are rather oddly cropped, mainly.
ann
Toine wrote:
A few orchids from yesterday's photowalk:
http://www.repiuk.nl/index.php/blog-mainmenu-97/141-orchids
Toine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
