I don't think a 100mm saves your back that much. maybe a cheap refconverter from china or a home made mirror on the LCD screen in combination with live view... Toine
On 25 June 2010 18:53, steve harley <p...@paper-ape.com> wrote: > i've been doing a lot of macro with with my 16-45, and enjoying it a lot, > but also getting tired of crawling around on the ground; i've realized a > 100mm (or longer) macro could save my back a bit of wear; i'm fine with > manual focus, but would prefer aperture control (green button slows me down > a lot), so what would people recommend as a real value in this category > (sub-$100 on a good craig's list day)? > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
