I agree. I don't understand why the newspaper insisted on investigating and reporting on this either. He was a good photographer, and took some great images of the civil rights movement. I am confident nothing he told the FBI harmed Martin Luther King or the movement. Why drag it up now?
Dan On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:56 PM, P. J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> wrote: > Considering how little a photographer makes/made he probably needed the > money. Considering that there was probably no actionable information be > sold the FBI was probably disappointed. If there were any real federal laws > being broken he should have reported it anyhow. I find this horribly silly > after all these years have past. Hoover is dead. Who freaking cares? > > On 9/15/2010 1:49 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: >> >> >> http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/14/us/14photographer.html?_r=3&partner=rss&emc=rss >> > > > -- > "His lack of education is more than compensated for by his keenly developed > moral bankruptcy." > -Woody Allen > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
