On 16 September 2010 05:38, Daniel J. Matyola <danmaty...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree. I don't understand why the newspaper insisted on > investigating and reporting on this either. He was a good > photographer, and took some great images of the civil rights movement. > I am confident nothing he told the FBI harmed Martin Luther King or > the movement. Why drag it up now? > > Dan >
Why drag it up? Because this photographer was apparently working under the umbrella of journalism, although my skim of the article doesn't reveal if he was a freelancer or attached to a news agency. His photographic subjects appear to have embraced him as a news-gatherer. Being an informer to an agency of the law is a serious breach of journalistic impartiality. regards, Anthony "Of what use is lens and light to those who lack in mind and sight" (Anon) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
