On Sep 24, 2010, at 6:47 PM, P. J. Alling wrote: >> On 9/24/2010 6:40 PM, Eric Weir wrote: >>> On Sep 24, 2010, at 5:10 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote: >>> >>>> In the old days it was a 28mm, 50mm, and a 135mm >>>> three lens set, all primes. you can do a lot with >>>> that set and if you can afford another, I would lean >>>> towards a 20mm for true wideangle work. A good 20mm >>>> isnt going to be cheap though. >>> >>> Thanks, J.C. Actually I do have a 135mm. But I gather it's not a very good >>> one. It's an Albinar. > > A very long time ago I used to sell them. They weren't horrible, but they > made better ashtrays.
I did have a clue. The price was $19.95. I figured what the hell. Back then I coulda afforded a lot better. Don't know what I was thinking of. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
